Process Performance
A comparison between the performance of the Lurgi dry ash and the BGL gasifier is given in Table 5-5.
The much lower steam and somewhat lower oxygen consumption of the slagging gasifier result in a much higher syngas production per unit of coal intake and a much lower yield of pyrolysis products compared with the dry bottom unit. Further, the C02 content of the gas is lower and the methane content in the gas is halved.
Table 5-5 Comparative Performance of Lurgi Dry Ash, BGL, and Ruhr 100 Gasifiers |
||||
Raw Gas Composition (Dry) |
Dry Ash Gasifier |
Slagging Gasifier |
Ruhr 100 90 Bar Carb. Gas |
Ruhr 100 90 Bar Clear Gas |
C02, mol% |
30.89 |
3.46 |
29.52 |
35.47 |
CO, mol% |
15.18 |
54.96 |
18.15 |
17.20 |
H2, mol% |
42.15 |
31.54 |
35.11 |
39.13 |
CH4, mol% |
8.64 |
4.54 |
15.78 |
7.93 |
CnHm, mol% |
0.79 |
0.48 |
1.02 |
0.04 |
N2, mol% |
0.68 |
3.35 |
0.35 |
0.19 |
H2S + COS, mol% |
1.31 |
1.31 |
||
NH3, mol% |
0.36 |
0.36 |
||
Feed components per |
||||
1000Nm3 CO+H2 |
||||
Coal maf, kg |
750 |
520 |
||
Steam, kg |
1930 |
200 |
||
Oxygen, Nm3 |
280 |
230 |
||
kg pyrolysis |
||||
products/1000kg coal |
81 |
19 |
||
Source: Supp 1990; Lohmann and Langhoff 1982 |
As mentioned above, the BGL gasifier has found a commercial application in waste gasification at the SVZ Schwarze Pumpe plant near Dresden in Germany. A 3.6m diameter BGL gasifier is fed with a mixed fuel of various wastes and coal. During test operation the unit has gasified a mixture of 25% hard coal, 45% refuse derived fuel (RDF) pellets, 10% plastic waste, 10% wood, and 10% tar sludge pellets.
During the performance test the following production and consumption figures were achieved (Greil etal. 2002):
Mixed Fuel (ar) |
30 |
t/h |
Specific oxygen consumption |
<0.2 |
Nm3/Nm3 dry syngas |
Gasification agent ratio steam/oxygen |
<1.0 |
kg/Nm3 dry syngas |
Raw syngas (dry) |
31,500 |
Nm3/h |
Gasification pressure is 25 bar. The ash content of the feed is discharged as a glassy frit. Analytical tests have demonstrated the nonleachability of the slag, and that disposal requirements, according to ТА Siedlungsabfall, class 1 (German waste regulations), have been met.