Financial Econometrics and Empirical Market Microstructure
AIG Case Study Using FNA HeavyTails™ Outlier Monitor
FNA’s recently launched HeavyTails application is network implementation of the Adaptive Stress Testing framework. The initial focus of HeavyTails is to monitor global market outliers.[25]
AIG’s collapse during the U. S. subprime crisis is a classic early warning case study. As policy makers wrestled with the implosion of Lehman Brothers, they were blindsided by AIG, which would require a record $182 bn bailout. Policy makers realized AIG was on the precipice only “days before its imminent collapse” recounts Phil Angelides, Chair, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission.
When analyzing the unusual price action of AIG stock, it becomes evident that major market participants suspected AIG’s precarious state for many months. Outlier based early warning signals would have been invaluable to policy makers in prioritizing their focus.
Figure 21 shows the Minimum Spanning Tree (Mantegna 1999) correlation network of major financial institutions on September 15, 2008, the day Lehman defaulted and AIG’s shares collapsed. Outliers are highlighted in red, and ranked by size. Lehman was the biggest surprise, as a 3.92 standard deviation (sd) loss, followed by AIG, a 3.68 sd surprise.
Fig. 21 September 15, 2008: Banking HeavyTails Network Graph. Source: FNA HeavyTails
AIG exhibited exceptional outlier activity leading up to the crisis. Figure 22 shows that there were 14 negative 95 % Confidence VaR outliers in the previous 100 trading days, almost triple the expected 5 % level. The probability of seeing 14 or more negative 5 % outliers in 100 days (assuming IID) is 0.0004632734.
AIG’s negative outliers were also exceptional when compared with other financial institutions. Table 3 ranks major institutions by number of negative VaR outliers as of market close on September 15, 2008.
AIG’s unusual level of negative outliers commenced almost a year before its eventual collapse. In Fig. 23 we can see that AIG’s stock experienced a —3.1 sd outlier (12.5 % decline) on February 11, 2008 as it announced “material accounting weakness” in its credit derivative portfolio. Again, outliers provided early warning, as AIG had been running at 9 % downside outliers vs. 3 % upside in 100 days as seen in Fig. 24. Notice AIG was the only major financial institution that experienced an outlier on that day.
Table 3 VaR outliers as of September 15, 2008